" /> Soft Skull News: May 2007 Archives

« April 2007 | Main | June 2007 »

May 30, 2007

Soft Skull Twitter

I may yet regret this, but I thought Soft Skull should try to twitter for BEA...So, should anyone be curious about the mad rhythms of a indie publisher's BEA activities, here's the RSS.

Also, here's our author schedule for BEA:

Saturday, June 2nd
10:30-11:30am Traditional Autographing Area, Table #5
MATTHEW SHARPE signing finished copies of JAMESTOWN: A NOVEL (Mar 07) “A work of hectic brilliance and immense sadness.”—Laura Miller, Salon “[A] wild, violent, mordantly hilarious retelling of how the first permanent English settlement in the New World came into being.—LA Times Book Review

3:00-3:30pm Foreword Magazine’s Indie’s @ Second Stage
ROBERT POLNER, editor of AMERICA’S MAYOR, AMERICA’S PRESIDENT? discusses the current front-runner for the Republic nomination…“[A] welcome antidote to the encomiums heaped upon America’s mayor…”—New York Times

4:00-5:00 Traditional Autographing Area, Table #25
DAVID SILVERMAN signing finished copies of
TYPO: THE LAST AMERICAN TYPE-SETTER (June 2007)
“[A]musing, appalling, infuriating and wonderfully written.”—Wall Street Journal


Sunday, June 3rd
(All signings in Booth 4311)

12:00-12:30—CRISTIN O’KEEFE APTOWICZ, author of WORDS IN YOUR FACE: A GUIDE TOUR THROUGH TWENTY YEARS OF THE NEW YORK CITY POETRY SLAM (Oct 07) Signing copies of her recent poetry chapbook

12:30-1:00 MATTHEA HARVEY and ELIZABETH ZECHEL signing posters for their all-ages picture book THE LITTLE GENERAL AND THE GIANT SNOWFLAKE (Oct 07)

1:00-1:30 MATTHUE ROTH signing his personal soundtrack to his Nancy-Drew-ish kung-fu 1:30-2:00 Wayne Koestenbaum signing ARC’s of HOTEL THEORY (July 07), “adding to his mind-altering oeuvre, Wayne Koestenbaum delivers a coup d’etat…”—Bookforum

Giuliani: The Anti Democracy Candidate

Robert Polner, editor of America's Mayor, America's President? is back blogging the Giuliani Watch for the Huffington Post.

The book is, as regular readers of this blog might already know, on sale on the Soft Skull website at a 50%, along with virtually every other Soft Skull book...

May 26, 2007

LA Times on Independent Publishing

Another great piece from the LA Times on publishing, this one on the Perseus shuttering of Carroll & Graf and Thunder's Mouth.

Has anyone noticed that in the past five-six months, Josh Getlin and Scott Timberg have together done most of the smarter features on book publishing? They pick more substantive topics than Motoko Rich, they interview more people, and the diversity of background of the people interviewed is far broader. Getlin also gave by far the most even-handed account of the print vs blog fracas, while spending the kinda time I guess an LA Times staffer has to spend on the ICM vs. Endeavour agency lawsuit and Scott has done some great ones on post-apocalyptic fiction, the PGW bankruptcy, and Akashic's City Noir series.

May 19, 2007

Sale, Sale..

So, as some of you have heard Soft Skull Press plans to be acquired by Winton Shoemaker Co. LLC—click here for the press release.

In some respects this is a sudden development, in other respects one could say this has been a long time coming. What it all means really remains to be seen. While it might seem appropriate for me to start pontificating here, the category under which I am posting this is, in fact, "Anticipatory."

This is certainly a paragraph in a key chapter in the history of American publishing, a chapter prefigured by the sale of PGW to AMS in 2003, and one that begins with the sale of Consortium to Perseus in the summer of 2006. I do not believe this chapter is over—for reasons which have to do with a difference between how PGW and Perseus account for returns, the full cash flow impact of the AMS/PGW bankruptcy will not be felt until July.

There are any number of regrets—that I was not able to keep the staff, currently Kristin Pulkkinen and Luke Gerwe is a big one, and there are other, that shall remain private—but I beg the readers of this blog to not indulge in apocalyptic thinking about independent publishing. The process of consolidation is, yes, relentless, but it is not eternal.

True, it is hard, in some respect, not to feel elegiac. As I've been preparing materials for a process known to those who buy and sell companies as "due diligence," it became clear how many people have contributed to allowing Soft Skull to publish the truly important books it has published over the years—my thanks to you now, my thanks to you eternally.

Yet Soft Skull is not over. As our wonderful author Sparrow said when he heard the news: "Soft Skull is dead. Long live Soft Skull." Soft Skull continues as an imprint. Soft Skull is not no longer independent. Had I won the lottery and bought Counterpoint from Perseus, instead of Charlie Winton buying Counterpoint and then Soft Skull, we would not have ceased to be independent.

Especially given the recent announcement by Perseus that it was closing Carroll & Graf and Thunders Mouth, it seems to me quite culturally valuable for Shoemaker/Counterpoint/Soft Skull—a group clearly embracing the imprint idea, clearly also eclectic and idiosyncratic—to be operating from a more solid financial foundation that hitherto. Allowing Soft Skull at least, to be less flakey.

I'll be blogging for a long time to come, and in the days, weeks and months to come, I promise to take some time out every so often to report on the transition, and I also promise to be as candid as possible about the process, about the ways in which things are harder, as well as the ways in which they're easier.

One little bit of hell right now is that we are seriously b-r-o-k-e for the next 6 weeks because this deal is not scheduled to close until June 30th. So, as a result, 40% off virtually everything on the Soft Skull website! Buy early, buy often! (Believe it or not, we need the ducats now far more than we did during the days of the PGW bankruptcy, this is one crazy-assed business...)


May 09, 2007

"You can't stop a tidal wave with a fork,"

says David Silverman, in the current lead article on Salon right now. And the publishing biz doesn't come out of it looking so nice...(Permalink)

(The article is adapted from his book TYPO which we're publishing next month...)

Our real problem came from our customers, the publishers. We offered to charge them as little as the Indian firms did, but most of them wouldn't even let us bid, preferring to squeeze as much profit as possible out of typesetting.

In the '90s, publishers had merged and merged and then merged some more. What had been hundreds of educational publishers was now just a few. Harcourt bought Mosby, Saunders, Academic Press and the Psychological Corp. Then Reed Elsevier bought Harcourt. The three top companies represented about 80 percent of our business and the pressures on us to maintain those customers were terrible. If Reed said, "Put an employee on site in our office in Texas," we did it, even though it cost us $100,000 a year, which was just about all of our profits on that account. If we said no, we'd have no business at all. It would have been like saying no to Wal-Mart. And just as it is at Wal-Mart, the mantra of our newly merged customers was: "Lower your prices."

May 08, 2007

Two interviews; Two askance-lookers

John Zuarino interviews Matthew Sharpe for Bookslut and takes issue on the Blog of a Bookslut with the NYTBR; and

Scott Esposito interviews Matthew Sharpe for Small Spiral Notebook and really takes issue, on his own blog, with the NYTBR...

Ed picked up on Scott's critique and also refers us to Richard's at The Existence Machine.

I also got words of support from others about the miserly and dim review, which means a lot, though begs the question—should I worry about these? Sadly, yes. In fact, I was already worried when I heard who the reviewer would be, since she'd already panned Oh Pure and Radiant Heart and clearly didn't like, a priori, political/satirical ahistorical fantasias. And the reason to be worried is that there is a thing in bookselling called sales velocity and, while the NYTBR can't create velocity except in unusual circumstances, it can accelerate it, or put the brakes on it, especially with hardcover $25 literary fiction. And velocity, because it affects the visibility of the books in the stores, where they're shelved, when they returned, is crucial—the difference between selling 3000 copies and 8000 copies, let's say...

Thus, one must worry. As a rule, I worry too much, but this time, for the moment at least, I was right to worry...

May 07, 2007

"young-authors-from-luchterhand-read-paul-fattaruso"

"young-authors-from-luchterhand-read-paul-fattaruso" is how it was described to me, when they emailed me for permission. Paul Fattaruso's Travel in the Mouth of the Wolf was acquired by, of all places, Random House Deutschland for publication in German. And, easy as it is to make fun of the Germans, a lovely crew of editors there took a chance on a beautiful fairy tale that was decidedly under-recognized here.

And one of the things they did, a la Julian Rubenstein's audiobook version of The Ballad of the Whiskey-Robber, is gather a whole bunch of their favorite young writers to read excerpts from the book.

Here's the site. [They called it, in German, Isabella's Love of the Flugelhorn.]

But it's all in German, you protest.

Not all: they also had me and Paul read sections ourselves, in English.

May 04, 2007

"[T]he great white hope of independent publishing..."

Lovely interview here with Matthew Sharpe, by Anne Elizabeth Moore (Soft Skull author, Houghton Mifflin author, New Press author, Punk Planet co-publisher). It's so delightful I reproduce here as much of it as Anne does in her blog but, in the spirit of helping out a fellow indie, I also reproduce the link to buy the issue of Punk Planet in question, cause I should, and you should...So Buy it here!

Matthew Sharpe, in many ways, is the great white hope of independent publishing: a tremendously successful—and very good—writer with an entrenched sense of integrity equally at home with Katie Couric on the Today Show as he is on the phone with Punk Planet.

Despite his family background in the independent press—his father runs the research and academic publishing house ME Sharpe—his first two books (Stories from the Tube and Nothing is Terrible) were published by Villard, a division of Random House. “I really did have this delusion that I think many authors do, that in order to be successful—even in order to be successful in my own self-image—I had to be published by one of these big, widely recognized names.” But the books didn’t sell very well, so when he start sending around the third—which eventually became the overwhelmingly successful Soft Skull Press-published The Sleeping Father—“the book was being rejected not on its merits but on the weakness of the sales of the two previous books. So no corporate-owned house would have me.”

Life at the indie, he says, is “in so many ways to be better, more lucrative, more pleasurable, more personally satisfying than I found my experience of working with the multinational conglomerate. Everything is on a more human scale.” Yet he’s still comfortable enough in the corporate world to allow the latest book, Jamestown, a soft-cover deal with Harcourt. It was a deal brokered in the nick of time, too: not only did it allow Sharpe a decent-sized advance—more than most independent houses can pay—but it offered some stability when it became clear that Soft Skull’s distributor, PGW, could give all its publishers serious financial trouble for some time to come.

His previous books have all focused on families—middle class, mostly—but Jamestown is a fictionalized account of the first ten years of the Jamestown settlement, and reenvisions the lives of real historical figures John Smith, Pocahontas, her father Powhatan, John Ratcliffe, John Martin, and John Rolf. But Sharpe, a nearly ridiculously engaging conversationalist with a penchant for knock-knock jokes, adds a psychiatrist/adviser named Sidney Feingold, text-messaging, and a bizarre onslaught of linguistic influences that range from pop songs to urban street lingo. For a story supposedly set 400 years ago, the backdrop the story plays against is far more September 11, 2001 (when a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in New York and Washington DC killed almost 3,000 people) than January 20, 1607 (when a tsunami swept the Bristol Channel and killed almost 2000 people).

Sharpe sat down with me on the phone on January 10, 2007, the night President Bush announced his plan to call for a surge of 21500 more troops to Iraq, an ongoing part of the post-September 11 War on Terror and a fitting backdrop against which to be discussing the bloody, messy foundations on which we first established this country 400 years ago.

Interview by Anne Eizabeth Moore, cuttings excerpted from the interview in PP79

So, what’s the new year got in store for you?

Oh you know. This.

You’ve planned it through the tenth and that’s it?

What else . . . I’m going to go back to school in a couple weeks and teach. I’m going to travel around reading out loud from my book.

In English?

Yes. Although I thought I might try reading it with sort of a Swedish Chef accent. It’s sort of a grim book, and I think anything would add a little “spice.”

Well, you did put a lot of jokes in there.

Oh! I have so many jokes for you, although they may not be appropriate for the interview.

No, go ahead. We can always cut out the inappropriate ones.

OK, well you know the one that goes, “Knock Knock?”

[There is an awkward pause.] That’s it? That’s not very funny.

Oh, wait! You hate jokes! That’s right! Oh, you’re a terrible person to tell jokes to.

What? No. That’s just not a funny joke.

There’s more. You have to do the second part. There’s two roles for you in this joke.

That’s what I hate about jokes. I have to do all the work.

The payoff here is gonna be so worth it. Knock, knock.

Who’s there?

Interrupting cow.

Interrupting—

—Moo. Knock, knock.

Who’s there?

Schizophrenic horse.

Schizophreni—

—Moo. Isn’t the buildup totally worth it?

The buildup is fantastic, but now I’m tired.

[Laughs.] Would you like to take a nap and call me back?

No, no. I think I’ll be OK. Do you mind if I ask you a few questions? The Sleeping Father was extremely successful, and received overwhelmingly positive reviews and netted you an appearance on the Today Show. Do you feel you have a lot to live up to with the new book?

We here at Matthew Sharpe, Writer and Educator, are giving ourselves a manicure with our teeth as we speak. I’m nervous and excited. The Today Show was a lovely, flukey thing. It’s shocking what five minutes on television will do for the life of an obscure literary author. I don’t know that the new book will sell quite as well as the other, but that part of it is really not under my control. The part that is under my control is already done. I tried something different with this book, and I figured out a way within the very limited thing that I do to express my beliefs about American foreign policy. And so I’m happy . . . I shifted to write about something that happened 400 years ago, and so I had to really rethink how I do everything.

Well . . . it was sort of 400 years ago.

Yeah, I guess one of the first things I had to do was figure out how to write about a place and time that is so remote from us, and me not being an historian and not thinking that I could write the way that people talked or wrote back then and really feeling like, as many books as I read on the subject, I did not feel confident that I had the text of what consciousness was at that time. Or even what any 48-hour period of someone’s life would be like. So one of the things I had to do was accommodate my own lack of knowledge and ability. Which is always a big thing that one must do when writing a novel. You have to make the best of your weaknesses.

The remainder of this interview can be found in PP79. Buy it here!

May 01, 2007

Peder Zane jumps through the page...

So one of the casualties of the book coverage carnage is to be Peder Zane, soon-to-be-former Books Editor of the Raleigh News & Observer. He's got this to say about the books he's loved since assuming that about-to-be-discontinued position.

If I could burst through this page, I'd give you a copy of With. Donald Harington's 2004 magical novel about a kidnapped girl who grows up in an Edenic (and haunted) patch of the Ozarks is one of the best books I've read since becoming the N&O's book review editor in 1996.

On top of "With," I'd hand you Cloud Atlas (2004), David Mitchell's dystopic tour de force that tells six related stories, stretching from the 19th century to the distant future, in six different literary styles. Then I'd add "My Happy Life" (2002 [but now out in paperback from yours truly]), Lydia Millet's quirky masterpiece, narrated by an abused and forgotten young woman who makes Candide seem like Chicken Little.

(Parenthetically, we got sent Harington's With back in 2003, and oh boy did I want to publish that book. But Soft Skull only pays $1K advances, and he said he got more than that in pre-inflation 1972 dollars for his first book. Eventually Toby Press picked it up, and re-issued his backlist, so all was well for him)

But, more generally, Peder's situation is quite interesting, in that while the paper is dropping the Books Editor position, he will now be the paper's Ideas columnist. Now, in the midst of the rightful concern about the collapse of book coverage, and the laying off of editors and such, we might, as some have surmised, be wise to not insist on the retention of the status quo ante—Peder could do more for Books as an Ideas columnist than a Books columnist. It is, after all, standard in book publicity to prefer "off-the-book-page-coverage" to the regular book review pages because it sells more books.

Now, I believe that newspapers should be devoting more time, intelligence and column inches to dealing with books overall (the demographics of book consumers and newspaper consumers overlaps to a great degree), but isolating that coverage in a stand-alone section with a sequence of one-person-says-a-few-things-about-one-book isn't necessarily the best way to engage readers OR writers.

The problem, of course, is that there is little sign amongst management in the larger newspapers that they will respond to the pressure for more advertising dollars and cost reductions by doing this. So I grasp why a good short-run tactic is to demand that book review sections will be preserved. But if, in certain circumstances, management will trust the dynamic editors and writers who know books to sprinkle throughout the paper, something great could be accomplished, and the current activist sentiment might well be well-directed in the long run to advocating for this more holistic approach. Could some of the articles that would otherwise be about the annual March-April flood of baseball books be incorporated into the fat start-of-the-baseball-season-sports supplement? Could self-help books being in Living sections? Current Affairs books by in the National or International pages? And could Arts & Ideas be a forum for novelists and poets to be discussed alongside filmmakers and dancers and philosophers and political scientists?

And then, could we abandon the absurd false distinction between newspaper and blogs. Y'all're writers, fer cryin' out loud. That's it. Bloggers are not the Barbarians at the Gate, and the individuals working in print media are not inside the Gate fiddling and fussing while Rome burns. There's a natural continuum, exemplified by newspaper critics blogging, and bloggers writing print reviews. The single most boring thing for me to read, on- and off-line, is the carping about the Other Side.

Anyway, a long lost for what originated as a way for me to tell everyone that we just put Lydia Millet's My Happy Life out in paperback (can you believe this book, which won the PEN-USA Award for Fiction, was never put out in paperback? Mad, mad, mad...)